[Don’t rush to zero loss] What to look at before moving the entry price to avoid wrecking your plan
Are you holding a position that makes you want to flee to zero losses just because you’ve earned a small unrealized profit?
What should you do to pause price level adjustments until the conditions you set before the order are reached?
This time, we’ll organize “price level movement” in the order of the anticipated responses.
Good evening!
This is Masashi ^^
? Do not rush to zero losses: what to look at before breaking your plan with price level movement
When you’re holding position that only earns a little profit, your emotions move before your usual sequence.
This time’s focus is the “price level movement.” Rather than flashy forecasts, it specifies where to pause your judgments.
In price level movement, do not treat GOLD as the ultimate remedy,
and treat it as a factor to confirm before the order, until the conditions you set before the order arrive.
To give the conclusion first: equating zero loss with correct management is not the same meaning as this week’s standard.
? Decide in advance the scenarios where price level movement would collapse
In practical trading, the most common is holding positions that make you want to flee to zero losses as soon as you profit a little.
What you want to avoid here is calling fear a price condition, and arbitrarily changing your initial price movement hypothesis mid-way.
If your feelings progress, first confirm only the “expected reaction” you had planned.
If you proceed without being able to explain the first adjustment, the display or knowledge will turn into excuses.
So if the “planned reaction” is unclear, you may revert to pausing price level movement until the pre-set conditions arrive.
Situations where you cannot explain the planned reaction do not proceed to orders or holding decisions.
The first stopping point is to ensure that you do not equate zero loss with correct management.
⚠ If you delay cuts, you’ll reconstruct the entry from price level movement
If you decide the direction before considering a stop loss, you’ll choose a place that matches the desire to enter.
This time, we’ll keep the connection to the “planned reaction” as a 1-1 link.
What you can write is only a form that can be explained by position, such as “when you break through the higher time frame wall, the assumed end occurs.”
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 1-2 for whether you are in the middle of the current wave.
If it’s too far, you’ll be more likely to accept it because it seems to move this time.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 1-3 for “the price at which you decided to retreat.”
Therefore, by changing the order of writing, write first where the assumption would break, and then determine the lot size from there.
This time, we will keep the connection as 1-4 for the “planned reaction.”
An unclear stop loss entry also makes holding decisions unclear.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 1-5 for “whether you’re in the middle of the current wave.”
So when you find a candidate order, place a location that ends before the profit target.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 1-6 for “the price at which you decided to retreat.”
In other words, with price level movement, the stop-loss position is not a post-order task, but a condition for choosing the entry.
If you cannot place the finish line because the moved price, reason, and subsequent price action are not laid out in three columns, then remove that moment from consideration.
? Rebuild price level movement by first identifying places that will be negated
First, search for places where you can judge that this premise was wrong.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 2-1 for whether you are in the middle of the current wave.
Next, check whether you can accept the distance to that point.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 2-2 for the price at which you decided to retreat.
Finally, consider whether you can protect that stop loss without widening it mid-way.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 2-3 for the “planned reaction.”
If any of the three is ambiguous, you won’t order even if the direction seems right.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 2-4 for whether you are in the middle of the current wave.
In terms of price level movement criteria, decide where you know it’s wrong before you decide the correct place.
The moved price, reason, and subsequent price action are three columns; the viewing points are negation positions, distance, and room you would want to widen midway.
✅ Reducing candidates: reconstructing the use of trailing stop movement from price level movement
When you find a concerning moment, do not place an order—just write the stop loss position.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 3-1 for the price at which you decided to retreat.
Return to the GOLD remedy check order and see if that spot connects to the market’s structure.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 3-2 for the “planned reaction.”
If the distance is too large, the negation position is unclear, or you want to move mid-way, remove it from consideration.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 3-3 for whether you are in the middle of the current wave.
Place the stop loss first and only review the remaining moments. This is how it works in practice.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 3-4 for the price at which you decided to retreat.
In price level movement terms, when you back-calculate from the stop loss, only the moments where you may enter remain, not the ones where you should not.
If the moved price, reason, and subsequent price action are three columns, and the candidates reduce, do not interpret it as missed opportunity.
❌ Rebuilding price level movement: do not allow large profits to block smaller losses
When it looks like it could rise significantly, you may want to accept a slightly farther stop.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 4-1 for the price at which you decided to retreat.
But the profit possibility is a forecast, and the distance to the stop is a fact at the time of the order.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 4-2 for whether you are in the middle of the current wave.
If you overwrite facts with forecasts, you’ll miss the move when it’s not as expected.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 4-3 for the price at which you decided to retreat.
Decide on a loss you can tolerate in advance, and exclude scenarios that fall outside that range.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 4-4 for the “planned reaction.”
In price level movement terms, when you imagine a large profit, do not view the immediate risk as smaller than it is.
The moved price, reason, and subsequent price action are three columns; stop loss is not a failure but a cost to end when your assumption is wrong.
? Rebuilding from price level movement for people who move the stop loss every time
Some people widen the stop loss when the market goes against them despite deciding to enter.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 5-1 for whether you are in the middle of the current wave.
Some people enter with a small lot while the stop loss is far away.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 5-2 for the price at which you decided to retreat.
They think about profit targets first and justify the entry later.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 5-3 for the “planned reaction.”
People like this need to exclude candidates from the stop loss rather than adopting a new entry method.
This time, we’ll keep the connection as 5-4 for whether you are in the middle of the current wave.
In price level movement terms, leaving only moments where you can place the stop loss reduces holding hesitation.
As a tool to reduce unnecessary entries, use this to erase impossible entries, not to add more entries.
? Measuring changes by the number of times moving the price, reason, and subsequent price action three-column setup
To state it as it is now,
the sequence of confirmations changes every time you hold after a small unrealized gain, wanting to flee to zero losses.
If you continue like this, you’ll call fear a price condition and mid-way changes to the initial price movement hypothesis,
and you’ll still have trouble comparing the same moments when you look back at price level movement.
Therefore, change to pausing price level movement until the conditions you set before the order arrive.
In 기록, by arranging the moments you adopted and the moved price, reason, and subsequent price action into three columns,
make the differences in price level movement visible.
By continuing only three-column records of moved price, reason, and subsequent price action for seven days, you can compare changes under the same conditions.
The numbers you look at after purchase are not only profits; measuring changes by the three-column format of moved price, reason, and subsequent price action is also a meaningful change.
One-week check: by lining up the adopted moment, moved price, reason, and subsequent price action in three columns, you can see the differences in price level movement and compare the same moments next week.
? The meaning of spending money and time on price level movement
It’s especially suitable for those who are repeatedly cut by normal swings through price level movement.
In practice, pausing price level movement until the conditions you set before the order arrive creates a change where you can stop your judgment mid-process.
The reason for buying is not to buy a new forecast, but to have an environment where zero loss does not equal correct management.
At the start, it’s enough to write, “Check: Planned reaction” in one sentence.
On the other hand, please confirm before you move to price level that not moving to price level is also not necessarily the correct answer.
If your difficulty overlaps with the scene of “Do not rush to zero losses with price level movement to break the plan,” you have a clear reason to carry GOLD remedies.
Purchase decision: for those who are cut by normal swings many times with price level movement, compare not by the feature name, but by how daily actions change.
? One change to start today and a summary
So, for those who are repeatedly cut by normal swings with price level movement, what should you change for the first time tomorrow?
This is best started by writing, “Check: Planned reaction” in one sentence first.
This week’s theme was price level movement.
What to check are the planned reaction, whether you are in the middle of the current wave, and the price at which you decided to retreat.
If the three do not connect, choose to pause price level movement until the conditions you set before the order arrive.
GOLD remedy used in price level movement is a material for judging not to equate zero loss with correct management and does not guarantee profit.
If you are repeatedly cut by normal swings with price level movement, first try the same record for a week to confirm how to use it ^^
If you keep wavering about “Check: Planned reaction before breaking the plan with price level movement to zero losses,” decide the GOLD remedy order of use before the next market.
Pre-purchase check for “Do not rush to zero losses with price level movement to break the plan”: decide one thing to reduce from your current judgment, not what to increase with GOLD remedy.
Thank you always for reading ^^