When I looked at the time axis in the middle, I found it again. However, to be honest

The finding is a genuinely happy report. However, not everything that was found was “the first time.”

About this series (Verification Journey Part 4 of 6)

• Episode 1: The sign of the fourth installment’s beginning (published)
• Episode 2: Does going up the timeline make it easier to pass? (published)
• Episode 3: The discomfort of seeing the same answer again (published)
• Episode 4: The wall did not disappear even if the timeline was changed (published)
• Episode 5 (this article): Found again in the intervening timeline ← right here

Reflecting on the journey so far

In the fourth installment, we have accumulated four insights up to this point. The “in-between” timeline (H1) also yielded its own results. But it wasn’t a simple upward trend. What we thought we were searching for turned out to be the same condition encountered earlier, reminding us not to jump to conclusions. And even if we changed the timeline, the very barrier to verification did not disappear.

【Image: 30_full_journey_map_s4.png to be inserted here (owner will paste manually)】

Conclusion: Even in the in-between timeline, multiple findings

Based on the verifications so far, I again report the findings.As a result of actually exploring the in-between timeline (H1), several robust candidates that pass with costs incorporated were found.

On a short timeline (5-minute bars), all failed; on a long timeline (4-hour bars), several passed. There is a result unique to the “in-between” itself. This is what was confirmed through this verification.

【Image: 30_middle_timeframe_result.png to be inserted here (owner will paste manually)】

However, there is something I want to tell you honestly

Here, please recall the two lessons shared in the previous posts. One is that “conditions that recur many times” may reflect a bias in the exploration mechanism. The other is that the verification barrier does not disappear even if the timeline is changed.

With these two in mind, I’ll be honest with you.Of the multiple candidates found this time, at least one essentially matches the conditions previously stated in this series’ articles.Not everything is a brand-new discovery.

Framing this as “changing the timeline reveals many new strategies” would misrepresent the stance of this research institute. That’s why I felt it appropriate to honestly share this at this stage.

【Image: 30_lights_one_same_color.png to be inserted here (owner will paste manually)】

Next time, we will tell you everything

Specifically, which currency pairs, what conditions were found, and which are truly new candidates versus those overlapping with past articles. Next time, I will summarize the details in one go.

There are differences in strength as well. Not all candidates found this time are of the same strength. I will honestly address this as well next time.

Disclaimers

• The content disseminated in this article does not constitute recommendations to buy or sell or investment advice. It is for information sharing only.
• Verification results based on past data do not guarantee the same results in the future. Markets always change.
• Whether you actually trade or not is your own responsibility.

The free portion of “Verification Journey Part 4” ends here. Thank you for reading so far. If you’re curious, please also check out the Indicator Research Institute’s product page.