View the returned price as a separate scene: Do not reuse previous justification

? See the Returned Price as a Different Scene: Do not reuse previous reasoning

Good evening!

This is Masashi^^

Today I’m writing for those who think that if a price reacts once, it will enter again for the same reasons.

Even if you return to the place that reacted in the morning in the evening, the waves in between and the participants’ states have changed.

Even at the same price, the path to get there is not the same. Rather than the amount of knowledge, we will narrow the confirmations used in this moment.

By removing the previous reasoning, the current second position becomes visible. We will make the short phrase “do not use the previous reasoning” the standard for today.

? Situations to use “do not use the previous reasoning”

If you break down the scene, even if you return to the place that reacted in the morning in the evening, the waves and participants’ states during that time have changed.

Even at the same price, the path to get there is not the same. Skipping this sense of disharmony makes the conclusion easier to decide first.

In particular, avoid using the previous reaction and stop-loss location simply because the price is the same.

From the perspective of “do not use the previous reasoning,” the explanation made after the result is not returned to the judging material before placing the order.

Even at the same price, if the flow to return there changes, confirm it as a different scene

This time’s starting point is, if you cannot rewrite the previous explanation in a single sentence, you should pass this time.

? Points to check to see if the waves formed before returning and the stopped place match the previous time

The idea is that the first return in this scene should be confirmed as a different scene if the flow to return there has changed, even at the same price.

By removing the previous reasoning, the current second position becomes visible. Do not try to eliminate the hurry; limit the confirmations you target.

First, whether the waves formed before returning and the stopped place are the same as last time.

Second, whether the previous stop-loss location also functions as a place that denies the current hypothesis.

If even with the standard of “do not use the previous reasoning” you cannot connect the confirmations, it’s fine to leave it as “unknown.”

To execute “do not use the previous reasoning,” place the conditions that stop judgment before emotions.

? Practice in one week

First task: gather three instances where you came back to the same price twice, and write in three lines what differed only in the second time.

To execute “do not use the previous reasoning,” look at whether you could reproduce the same confirmations rather than profits or counts.

The main metric to record is the number of times you could re-confirm without copying the previous reasoning.

Even on days you couldn’t, if you leave them, you’ll see where you would place the product when you think you’ll re-enter for the same reason after it has already reacted once.

The one-week trial of “do not use the previous reasoning” counts only the number of times you could re-confirm without copying the previous reasoning.

Do not increase the practice of “do not use the previous reasoning”; continue with the same item for seven days for comparison.

✅ The three confirmations when using “do not use the previous reasoning”

First, confirm whether the waves formed before returning and the stopped place are the same as last time.

Next, express in one sentence in your own words whether the previous stop-loss location also functions as a place that denies the current scenario.

Finally, if you cannot rewrite the previous explanation in a single sentence, decide to pass this time.

To implement “do not use the previous reasoning,” if any one of the three is blank, close the scene.

When using “do not use the previous reasoning,” place the reason for acceptance before the reasons you will skip.

Stopping criteria for “do not use the previous reasoning”: if you cannot rewrite the previous explanation in a single sentence, you pass this time.

⚠ Movements to avoid with “do not use the previous reasoning”

The easiest to revert is to reuse the previous reaction and the stop-loss location simply because the price is the same.

In the records of “do not use the previous reasoning,” do not fix everything at once; check only whether the waves formed before returning and the stopped place are the same as last time.

What you fix is not the result, but a prior check on whether the previous stop-loss location also denies the current expectation.

If you leave the number of times you re-confirmed without copying the previous reasoning the same, you won’t bring a lucky judgment to the next time.

In the reflections of “do not use the previous reasoning,” do not break the confirmations that you could protect with a single result.

One change at a time for “do not use the previous reasoning.” Compare again next week in the same scene.

? How to use GOLD-specific remedy with “do not use the previous reasoning”

Use the GOLD-specific remedy positions, waves, and the reason to wait, re-reading not by price name but by the process to reach it.

In scenes where you use “do not use the previous reasoning,” place the purpose of holding the product not as the number of entries, but as the reproduction of confirmations.

From a state where you progress for different reasons each time, if you cannot rewrite the previous explanation in a single sentence, decide to pass for now and switch to a state that can be skipped.

Therefore, when returning to a price that reacted once, those who think they will enter again for the same reasons should decide the situation to use before the name of the function.

To implement “do not use the previous reasoning,” use GOLD-specific remedies not as substitutes for answers, but to prevent confirmations from becoming scattered.

A price that reacted in the past does not guarantee the same result next time

? People who can use “do not use the previous reasoning” as a standard

Those who can return to the price that reacted once and re-enter for the same reasons are suited for this.

The judgment of “do not use the previous reasoning” is not about discarding discretion but about using discretion in the same order.

On the other hand, past prices that reacted do not guarantee the same result next time.

The GOLD-specific remedy does not guarantee profit, and it is not a product that creates reasons to pass if you cannot rewrite the previous explanation in a single sentence.

The more you can decide not to use a previous reasoning in a practical way, the more realistically you can use the product.

Practice of “do not use the previous reasoning” should be checked for misalignment with judgment in demos or small conditions.

? Summary: Do not use the previous reasoning

What I wanted to convey this time is that even at the same price, if the flow to return there changes, confirm it as a different scene.

First, check whether the waves formed before returning and the stopped place are the same as last time.

Next, whether the previous stop-loss location also functions as a place that denies the current projection.

And if you cannot rewrite the previous explanation in a single sentence, and you pass this time, you skip that one instance.

From tomorrow, start by gathering three instances where you came back to the same price twice, and write the difference in three lines for the second time only.

If you can record the number of times you re-confirmed without copying the previous reasoning, you’ll see evidence that your judgments have changed beyond just wins or losses.

If you return to a price that reacted once, and think you will enter again for the same reasons, please check the content and usage of GOLD-specific remedies ^^

Do not use the previous reasoning. Leave this single item for the next scene.

Pre-purchase confirmation: A price that has previously reacted does not guarantee the same result next time. Check whether it matches the role you seek.

?View details of GOLD-specific remedy

Thank you always for reading ^^