[Do not add a reason after moving] The first 60 seconds right after opening the chart

? Do not add a reason after moving: 60 seconds right after opening the chart

Good evening!

This is Masashi^^

Today, this is for people who open the screen and already see a price range and want to find a reason to follow it.

When you open the chart, you immediately notice a large price move and the places that have already reacted.

The explanations that arise at that moment are not necessarily market information. Rather than the amount of knowledge, we narrow down the confirmations to use in this moment.

Here, the short 60-second interval becomes effective. We take as our standard today the short phrase “do not add a reason.”

? Situations where you “do not add a reason”

If you break down the scene, when you open the chart, you simultaneously see a large price move and the places that have already reacted.

The explanations that arise at that moment are not necessarily market information. If you skip this sense of dissonance, the conclusion tends to be decided first.

In particular, you want to avoid quickly gathering explanations that fit the moved direction and adding grounds that you did not have from the start to your order reason.

From the perspective of “not adding a reason,” the explanations created after the result are not returned to the decision-making materials before placing an order.

Right after opening, do not decide on the direction; separate the facts you can see now from the movements that have already ended

The starting point here is that if you cannot add even one new reason to place an order, you should pass on that moment.

? A point to check whether the observation place you had decided before opening the screen still remains

The first thing to return to in this moment is the idea of not deciding the direction right after opening, and separating the facts you can see now from the movements that have already ended.

Here, the short 60-second interval becomes effective. Don’t try to erase the sense of urgency; reduce the objects you verify.

First, whether the observation place you had decided before opening the screen still remains.

Second, whether you can describe in your own words the place where you would end if your assumption is different before placing an order.

If even with the standard of “not adding a reason” the checks don’t connect, you may leave with the conclusion that you don’t know.

To implement “not adding a reason,” place the conditions for stopping the decision ahead of emotions.

? How to use Golden Line Sniper AI for “Not Adding a Reason”

Use Golden Line Sniper AI not as a screen that rushes to give an answer, but as a screen that brings the confirmations to one place.

In scenes where you use “not adding a reason,” the purpose of holding the product changes from the number of entries to the reproduction of confirmations.

If you must add at least one new reason to proceed from a state where the reason is different each time, then change that moment to a state where you can skip it.

Therefore, when you open the screen and there is already a price range, and you want to find some reason to follow it, you need to decide in advance the situations where you will use the feature rather than the name of the function.

To implement “not adding a reason,” the Golden Line Sniper AI is used not to replace your answer but to prevent a scattering of confirmations.

Even with a display, it does not justify the places where movements have already completed or where you cannot place a stop loss

?View details of Golden Line Sniper AI

✅ Three verifications when using “Not Adding a Reason”

First, check whether the observation place you had decided before opening the screen remains.

Next, state in one sentence in your own words whether you can describe the place where you would end if your assumption differs before placing the order.

Finally, if you must add at least one new reason to place an order, decide to pass on that moment.

To implement “not adding a reason,” leave any one of the three blank; then close that moment.

When using “not adding a reason,” before adopting the reason, put the condition to pass first into words.

Stop criteria for “Not Adding a Reason”: If you must add at least one new reason to place an order, skip that moment.

⚠ Movements to avoid with “Not Adding a Reason”

The easiest to revert to is quickly gathering explanations that fit the moved direction and adding grounds you did not have from the start to the order reason.

In records of “Not Adding a Reason,” do not fix everything at once; check only the locations you had decided before opening the screen.

What you fix is not the result, but the before-order confirmation that could be described if your assumption is wrong.

If you leave with the same standard without adding post hoc reasons, you will not carry over quick judgments to the next time.

In the review of “Not Adding a Reason,” do not break the confirmations that you could keep based on one result.

One change at a time for “Not Adding a Reason.” Compare the following week in the same scenario.

? Practice for a Week

The first task is in the latest 10 scenes: after opening the screen, do not place an order for 60 seconds, and leave the first three facts you saw in three lines.

To implement “Not Adding a Reason,” first check whether you can reproduce the same confirmations rather than focusing on profit or frequency.

The main metric to record is the number of times you could close without adding a post hoc reason.

Even on days you couldn’t do it, if you still can see the price range when you open the screen, you will see where to position yourself to use the product when you want to chase some reason.

The week to try “Not Adding a Reason” counts only the number of times you closed without adding post hoc reasons.

Practice of “Not Adding a Reason” does not increase the amount; compare the same single item for seven days.

? People who can base themselves on “Not Adding a Reason”

Ideal for those who already see a price range when opening the screen and want to follow it by finding a reason.

The decision to “Not Add a Reason” is not to abandon discretion, but to use discretion in the same order.

On the other hand, even with a display, it does not justify places where movements have already ended or where you cannot place a stop loss.

Golden Line Sniper AI does not guarantee profits; if you must add at least one new reason to place an order, this is not a product that creates order reasons for you to pass on the moment.

People who can decide which scenes not to use it in can use the product more realistically.

Practice of “Not Adding a Reason” should be checked for discrepancies between judgment and reality using a demo or small conditions.

? Summary: Not Adding a Reason

What I wanted to convey this time is that right after opening, you should not decide the direction and you should separate the facts you can see now from the movements that have already ended.

First, check whether the observation place you decided before opening remains.

Next, if your assumption is different, you should be able to describe the place where you would end before placing an order.

And if you must add a new reason to place an order, skip that moment; you can pass on that one occasion.

From tomorrow, start by not placing an order for 60 seconds after opening, and leave the first three facts you saw within the latest 10 scenes.

If you can record the number of times you closed without adding post hoc reasons, you will see evidence that your judgment has changed beyond winning or losing.

If you open the screen and a price range is already present, and you want to chase some reason, please check the content and usage of Golden Line Sniper AI ^^

Not adding a reason. Leave this one in the next moment.

Pre-purchase check: Even if there is a display, it does not justify places where movements have already ended or where you cannot place a stop loss. See if it fits the role you seek.

?View details of Golden Line Sniper AI

Thank you always for reading^^