BuilderOU STORY【Chapter 1】Episode 13 — BuilderOU, who was only a name, begins to move
BuilderOU STORY|Episode 13
BuilderOU, which had only been a name,
begins to move
Teach. Verify. Create. Support.
From separate experiences, into one business.
Hello.
BuilderOU (King Builder)
This is Mr. Ojun.
In Episode 12, I spoke about how some people I taught began to generate profits, while others broke the rules after winning, raised their living standards too much, did not think about taxes, or lost their funds.
I thought that if I taught a trading method, the other person could practice it in the same way. If I conveyed knowledge, they could approach the same results.
However, what was taught and what actually happened were different.
Understanding. Practice. Persistence. Continually following the rules. Each of these is a completely different problem.
Simply imparting knowledge does not create reproducibility.
A教材 that is easy to use for anyone. A verification environment where results can be confirmed. A system that protects funds. A standard to revert to when mistakes are made. And a format that can continue to support after teaching.
If you don't create that much, you can't really support people's futures.
From here, I began to think about creating a business that not only teaches with goodwill but also delivers responsibly.
What had been only a name, BuilderOU, began to move in a real sense.
1. The past things had
all been separate
I have created many things so far.
Indicators. Programs for backtesting. Excel sheets to analyze results. Rules for money management. Notes to explain to people. Records of questions from each person.
Conditions that failed. Times when I couldn't win. Sign tools that couldn't be used.
When looked at one by one, each was different.
However, simply existing separately, the user would have to understand all of them on their own.
Using indicators. Taking backtests. Transferring results to Excel. Segmenting by time. Checking win rate. Setting money management. Recording trades. Considering reasons for failures.
It's not easy for a beginner to do all of that alone.
I spent years learning through failures.
However, later entrants do not have to take the same long detour.
Could I connect what I have made so far into one flow? I began to think this.
2. The order of teaching,
which had to be created
Until now I answered questions from others.
If they didn't understand how to read a chart, I explained the chart. If they were struggling with money management, I explained money management. If losses continued, I looked at trading history to consider causes.
I conveyed what that person needed each time.
However, people learned in completely different orders.
Some people try to learn only winning methods without understanding the basics. Some try to memorize entry methods without deciding money management. Some begin real trading without taking backtests.
Even if you teach the same content, the reception changes depending on the foundation.
When building a house, you can't start with the roof. Build the foundation. Erect the columns. Build the walls. Then the roof. There is a order.
Trading is the same.
What to learn first. What you must be able to do to move on. Where to verify. Where to practice. If you fail, how far back you return.
There was a need to create that flow.
3. Verification,
which I wanted to make accessible to anyone
I have emphasized the importance of backtesting many times.
However, simply telling people, "Please verify for yourself," many people still couldn't take action.
What should be verified? Over how many years should one investigate? How should signals be counted? How should wins and losses be judged? How should time frames be divided? How should it be entered into Excel?
At that point, there are too many unknowns.