The win rate of the “Transactions are at your discretion” tool is an unverifiable number

If the description of the sign tool says this, please skim through the winning rate numbers. “Entries follow the signals, executions are flexible based on market conditions.”

Since the executions are discretionary, that tool has no winning rate. Even for the same signal, someone taking +10 pips to take profit and someone waiting until −30 pips and exiting at break-even will yield different results. In other words, performance varies by operator, and the term “winning rate of this tool” cannot even be defined. Even so, if the sales page lists a winning rate, it is a number that includes someone’s discretion and cannot be reproduced.

And this structure is a convenient safeguard for the seller. If the buyer loses, they can say “the exit was poor.” The boundary between signal responsibility and your responsibility is erased from the start.

‘GENSEN-AI’ reverses this. The signals come with predefined take-profit and stop-loss levels, and settlements are fixed by the tool. By removing room for discretionary exits, it becomes possible to count the outcomes of all signals mechanically for the first time. The number of settled cases is 227 with a win rate of 75.3%, because settlements are fixed. Tools with discretionary settlements cannot achieve this kind of tally in principle.