How did ZANEA create a “structure that doesn’t break”?

In the article, I wrote,

“Before thinking about ‘how to win,’
I began to think about ‘how to end.’

.”

That idea becoming a real “shape” is what Zanki EA is.

Zanki isn’t
just a take-profit EA.

It’s built to reduce the points where people break

through its structure.

For example,
people get greedy when profits rise.

“It might go a little further,”
“This could be the main move.”

And thus,
they end up unable to take profits.

Conversely,
when in drawdown,

“It might come back.”
“I can endure a little longer.”

And then, they become unable to end the trade.

In short, people are more challenged by ending
than starting.

That’s why Zanki EA has a fixed take-profit.

Profit,
“to end it.”

That’s the structure for it.

Furthermore,
a Guard to protect profits.

After a certain profit,
an BE near the breakeven point.

A structure that judges on the close price.

Everything is not for
“to win more.”
,

but to prevent breaking.

I’m not trying to erase emotions.

With the assumption that emotions exist,
I want to create a form that won’t break.

Zanki EA was
a structure for that purpose.

Trading doesn’t collapse just from entry.

Rather, most often, it collapses at the
“exit.”

So I wanted to structure
not “how to enter,”

▷“how to end.”

First and foremost.