Can you still not tell the difference between a "real trader" and a "fake"?

Unfortunately,
"being popular does not mean it's real."

Many followers.
flashy profit images.
luxury cars.
wads of cash.
daily boast of huge profits.

But, there,

"how did you win"

this type of person who lacks this "substance" is quite many.

What really matters is,

・whether it is reproducible
・whether the explanations are concrete
・whether they talk about losses
・whether they can verbalize their entry rationale

here.

To put it more simply,

"whether people who purchased actually grew"

this is the most important.

In the end,
no matter how impressive they sound,

the purchasers

"became able to win"
"reduced unnecessary losses"
"set up rules"

if it hasn't become like this, it has no meaning.

Conversely, the fake ones tend to be

・abstract
・only talk about mindset
・mask the atmosphere
・hide the parts that are inconvenient

this trend is strong.

In FX,
originally it's quite modest.

Wait.
Check.
Cut losses.
Repeat the same thing.

Yet,
the ones with the flashy presentations are more popular in this world.

That's why beginners get deceived.

"Looks like easy money"

because it seems that way.

But the reality is the opposite.

The people who truly win,
the content they talk about is concrete.

・where to wait
・which candlestick to enter
・where to cut losses
・what to do about taking profits

they explain these without dodging.

By the way, my own教材 (course materials) are
not intuitive

"how I actually judge things"

written in quite a lot of detail.

So,

"trading without a clear method"

I think this will resonate with those who want to break free from that.

If you need it, go to the profile.