Has the indicator settings under verification finally been decided? That’s the story
Trading livestream using RUSING around 9 PM on weekdays!
This is a trading livestream using a mischievous indicator I started last week, and finally the settings that feel like “this might be it” have solidified. It began as a casual livestream using a random indicator, but it’s become an interesting validation process for me as well.
My thought process is to let it swim freely for a while, gradually tighten it on the EA side, and ultimately see when it would blow up (when funds in the account would disappear), and decide on a setting that hits a reasonable limit.
So with the current settings, it won’t blow up. It might delay stop-loss due to the bug (latency) in the tool that I touched when discussing the rapid changes, but it’s a setting where losses can be recovered. There is one more point I want to refine, but the setup to be streamed today is nearly decided. I will further verify how profits rise and losses increase.
If this yields results that are somewhat satisfactory, I’m thinking of doing a livestream trading with indicators that measure distance away. Of course, since this is a feature introduction for RUSING, I will stop scaling (pyramiding).
By the way, today’s setup is,
- Multi-timeframe MA filter
- Zigzag exit
- Lump-sum take profit (+1000 yen)
- Fixed pyramiding of 0.02 lot
- Others
Yesterday’s trading livestream used the same account for today as well, and the following situation has occurred. Also, during yesterday’s livestream I had to work, so it ended with a loss. Due to YouTube’s algorithm, even if the video is public, it won’t be watched during the livestream, so I’m adding this note just in case.
From the indicators being used, I believe a proper stop-loss has been found. How much you lose is important. Although this differs from my own thinking, this operating design EA “RUSING” is a tool that adapts indicators to the user and usage conditions, so this conceptual approach is reasonable.