Control the results
This is a continuation of yesterday's discussion.
“It won’t crumble even with randomness.”
Is this really true?
To state the conclusion first,
it can be true depending on the conditions.
However, what I don’t want you to misunderstand here is
that this is a story about
“you can win easily even with randomness.”
What’s important is
not the entry, but the “structure.”
For example,
if a single trade is designed to lose most of the funds,
then any method will crumble.
On the other hand,
if one loss is kept small and the design can withstand a row of losses,
then the funds won’t crumble easily.
Only then does
the “probability” start to function.
Many people
・increase win rate
・increase accuracy
・deepen analysis
focus on such things, but
that is an approach toward the “results.”
What is truly important is
the design that controls the results prior to them.
Trading when the lot sizes are not aligned leads to,
no matter how much you analyze,
being swallowed by swings of luck.
Conversely,
if the lot sizes are aligned,
including both wins and losses,
it becomes the “results as designed.”
This is the decisive difference between those who trade with stability and those who crumble.
The “lot control” I teach is not merely about protecting capital.
It is a design to grow while protecting.
Assuming a string of losses,
while controlling capital depletion
to accumulate profits.
Because of this structure,
trading becomes a skill, not a feeling.
From the stage of looking for answers on the chart,
to the stage of designing the capital.
? Details here
https://www.gogojungle.co.jp/finance/navi/articles/113407