【Emergency企画第3弾|8.8 / 10の高評価】Prime ACEをChatGPTに厳正評価してもらいました。
Good morning.
I am the developer and trader A (Ace) of the “Prime ACE Strategy.”
Up to this article,
Prime ACE first looks for the main battleground on the panel,
then regards arrows as candidate signals within that,
and finally narrows them down by discretion—this is the tool I have described.
In the previous urgent projects,
I wrote that by changing the settings, you could shift from a focus on repetitions to a focus on quality, and vice versa, changing the scenery.
This is the third installment.
However, this time I’m changing the perspective a bit,
and not relying on my own somewhat boasting explanations,
but representing it in a form where ChatGPT’s Thinking Extension mode evaluates strictly, including numbers, balance, and risk aspects.
So I took that approach.
What you’ll see this time is a
base set of the bonus preset with substantially narrowed changes.
What was changed:
・Increase trend strength by one step to “5”
・Change TP / SL to 5:1
These are the only two changes.
The lot size remains fixed at 0.05 lots.
In other words, it’s not a drastically overhauled setting,
but rather an extension of the bonus preset,
to see how it looks if we push a little further.
The testing conditions were,
Gold 15-minute chart,
period from mid-April 2025 to mid-April 2026, about one year,
all ticks, modeling quality 99.90%, variable spreads,
initial margin 1,000,000 yen.
The results were,
Net profit+1,603,395 yen
PF2.58
Maximum DD418,372 yen (15.01%)
Total trades151 trades
Win rate39.74%
That was the result.
And this time, evaluated by ChatGPT’s Thinking Extension mode,
8.8 / 10
as the result.
A fairly high score.
However, it was not an unconditional praise;
it separated good points from points of concern and gave a strict assessment.
First, the highly regarded aspect was,
even with a fixed 0.05 lot, the logic’s expected value is quite strong.
In particular, what stood out was not the win rate itself,
but the balance between wins and losses
.The average winning trade was
43,621 yen,
the average losing trade was11,141 yen.
In other words, even with a 40% win rate,
the average profit greatly exceeds the average loss.
A classic Prime ACE shape: small losses, large profits clearly visible.
Furthermore,
PF 2.58 andMaximum DD 15.01% balance were also viewed quite favorably.
Even if profits are large,
if the drawdown behind them is too heavy,
holding on in practice becomes difficult.
In this case,
starting with 1,000,000 yen and fixing at 0.05 lot,
the balance between profit growth and drawdown weight is quite well aligned
.
On the other hand, there are reasons it was not a perfect score.
That is,
a win rate of 39.74% is a number that can deter some people.
Furthermore,
there is a sequence with up to 13 consecutive losses.
And,
these results are specifically
for the Gold 15-minute chart over about one year,
and cannot be said to apply in the same way to any other symbol or period.
In short,
8.8 points does not come from thinking it’s easy to win;
the core logic is strong
the balance of profit and drawdown is good
but it is not a high-win-rate system that’s easy to handle
which is the classic trend-following Prime ACE evaluation.
I believe this evaluation is actually favorable.
or “Just enter when the arrow appears.”
Rather, it looks for the main battleground on the panel first,
views arrows as signal candidates within that,
and finally narrows by discretion.
If needed, you can align the settlements with the bonus EA.
This flow makes it meaningful to adopt a slightly aggressive setting,
not merely as numbers piled up, but as a way to decide how to fight.
The current result also reflects this quite well.
The changes from the bonus preset are
to raise the trend strength by one level,
and set TP / SL to 5:1.
Even so, the scenery changes this much.
Moreover, even when strictly evaluated by ChatGPT Thinking Extension mode,
it earned a high rating of 8.8 / 10.
This shows that
Prime ACE is not a tool that pushes a fixed correct answer,
but a tool whose approach to fighting can be changed by settings.
It reinforces that point for me.
This time,
we asked ChatGPT to evaluate Prime ACE strictly,
in a third-party perspective,
and the result was quite substantial.
If you’re interested, please also check the product page.
▼ Product page
‘Prime ACE Strategy’
https://www.gogojungle.co.jp/tools/indicators/77315?via=users