Good morning.

I am the developer and trader A (Ace) of the "Prime ACE Strategy."

In the emergency project #1,
using JP225 as an example, by changing parameters
we have looked at how the panel numbers and scenery change.

This time, as the second installment,
we will look at the differences with settings in Gold.
It will be a bit long, but please stay with us to the end.

First of all, what I want to convey is that
this time as well
“this setting is not the absolute correct one.”
is the message.

Prime ACE is
not a tool that just enters as soon as an arrow appears,
but a tool to explore where to trade and how to trade using parameters and panels
.

In other words, the meaning of changing settings is
not to seek a magical correct answer,
but to find the market where you fit and your way of trading
.

For this time, all are
in Gold (XAUUSDm) M15,0.01 lot
for comparison.

The period isapproximately the last two months and a half.
What changes is only the parameter.

First image, the first slide, is
a default-leaning baseline setting.

The number of trades is195,
the win rate is57.4%,
the PF is0.88,
net profit is -81,871 yen,
maximum drawdown was 221,195 yen (19.42%).

What becomes visible here is
even with a fairly good win rate, that alone is not enough
.

If you only look at the win rate of 57.4%, it isn’t bad.
However, the PF falls below 1.0, and ultimately it ends in loss.

In other words,
even with many wins, if the profit-taking design isn’t appropriate, it won’t lead to profit
.

Prime ACE is not a tool to chase only the win rate.

While looking at the panel,
to see whether you can truly trade under those conditions
.

Next, the second image
is the TP/SL design changed from 1:1.5 to 1.5:1.

Here the scenery clearly changes.

The number of trades remains195.
Meanwhile, the win rate drops from 57.4% to 38.5%.

However,
the PFimproves to 1.23,
and net profit grows to217,625 yen.
Maximum drawdown is 264,107 yen (18.49%).

So what becomes clear here is
even with a lower win rate, overall performance can improve with profit target design
.

As in the previous JP225 edition, the market is not decided by win rate alone.
The question is how to suppress losses and how far you can extend when you win.

Even by changing that design, the panel scenery changes greatly.

Furthermore, the third image shows
from the state in image 2
an increased trend strength filter by one level.

The number of trades is123,
the win rate is39.0%,
the PF is1.41,
the net profit is236,823 yen,
the maximum drawdown was 217,097 yen (15.91%).

Compared with image 2,
the number of trades has decreased.
However, PF improved further,
net profit increased slightly,
and maximum drawdown was controlled.

The change here is naturally viewed as
emphasizing profit per trade while slightly reducing noise
.

In other words, from a broad candidate-hunting state,
the selection is tightened a bit.

At this stage,
Prime ACE is not just a sign tool, but
a tool that can adjust whether to go for quantity or quality
.

And in the fourth image,
we further drastically change the concept.

This time,
time filter from 00:00-23:59 to 15:00-23:59 was changed to and

make the trailing stop false
as an adjustment.

As a result,
the number of trades is47,
the win rate is61.7%,
the PF is2.39,
the net profit is266,797 yen,
the maximum drawdown was 74,673 yen (5.87%).

Because the number of trades dropped sharply,
the approach changes to trading with careful selection rather than broad picking
.

In addition,
the win rate rises,
the PF improves to 2.39,
and the maximum drawdown drops significantly.

This can be viewed as
clearly separating “when to trade” from “how to keep profits”
.

What becomes evident from this Gold comparison is that
indeed
there is no single correct setting
.

The first image, the default-leaning setting, serves as the foundation to see the overall picture.

In the second image,
by changing TP/SL from 1:1.5 to 1.5:1,
you can see that even with a lower win rate, the overall profitability can change.

In the third image,
you can further reduce noise and aim to improve quality.

In the fourth image,
we can go further into the idea of time windows and settlements,
and you can see a more selective trading method.

In other words, Prime ACE is
not a tool that imposes a fixed answer,
but a tool that can adjust its character to fit your own trading style
.

Because there is this room for adjustment,
Prime ACE does not end as a mere sign display, but becomes a tool to search for your primary battlefield.

Simply looking at arrows alone will not reveal this strength.

First, look for your primary battlefield on the panels.
Then, while viewing the arrows as candidates,
narrow further to situations with higher discretion and advantage.
Next, use the premium EA to manage and finalize the settlements.

This flow is the core of Prime ACE.

From this Gold comparison,
“Even with the same logic, how you trade can change this much with different settings”
I would be happy if this comes across at least a little.

If you are interested, please also check out the product page.

▼ Product page here

『Prime ACE Strategy』
https://www.gogojungle.co.jp/tools/indicators/77315?via=users