Good morning.

I am A, the developer and trader of the Prime ACE Strategy.

Last time,
there is no arrow that can persistently work in the market itself,
and
the market is not so easy to win with complete discretion,
which is why a compass that shows candidates is necessary,
I wrote about that.

This time, as a continuation,
why didn’t Prime ACE become a fully “leave-it-all-to-me” system
?
I would like to write about it.

To start with the conclusion,
I think thatcompletely discretionary systems have their limits,
and completely automated systems have their limits.

Completely discretionary systems have freedom.
You watch the market, choose for yourself, and act yourself.
That strength certainly exists.

But on the flip side,
the judgments tend to become heavy each time.
Including post-entry management,
the emotional swings tend to translate directly into results.
You may want to take profits earlier,
you may want to move stop-loss,
the things you originally wanted to do tend to crumble.

On the other hand, completely automatic systems look easy.
But because they look easy,
people tend not to think about market changes.

Even if it works at first,
when the environment changes,
“why did it break?”
“where should it be fixed?”
becomes hard to see.

And I think that
leaving everything to machines tends to become obsolete the longer you use it.

That’s why Prime ACE aims for the middle ground.
Our battlefield is the panel.

Viewing arrows as candidates is the indicator.
Deciding whether to take those candidates is up to humans.
And the post-entry management and settlement are supported by the bonus EA.

This division of roles.

What matters here is that
Prime ACE
is not designed to “eliminate humans,”
but to separate the parts that humans should keep from the parts that can be handed off for tidier operation.
This is the idea.

Where to fight.
Which arrows to take.
These parts are better kept by humans.

Conversely,
the post-entry management and settlement are areas where human emotions can wobble.

Therefore,it is easier to stabilize with EA support.

I do not believe this form is a magic that lets you live easily.

However,
for people who seriously want to continue in the market,
it is a practical compromise to continue realistically
.

Not everything is left to chance.
Not everything is shouldered by oneself.

Find candidates,
look for the main battlefield,
in the end a person chooses,
and after that, organize management and settlement.

Prime ACE
is built on this flow.

That’s why,
I don’t consider it merely a signaling tool,
or merely automated trading.

While leaving the materials to think about the market,
lightening the burdensome parts.
For that,it is a hybrid tool..

It’s not about gambling for a single big win,
not for half-hearted play,
but about facing the market a bit more earnestly.
Among that,
carrying everything by oneself is too heavy.
But leaving everything to be done is also wrong.

For those who feel that way,
I think Prime ACE’s approach fits well.

Until now, in several installments,
I’ve described Prime ACE’s philosophy and usage,
and at the core,
it isn’t that I wanted to create a tool you can use without thinking at all,
but that I wanted to create a tool that makes it easier to manage while leaving the parts you should think about.
.

This time, it leaned a bit toward development philosophy.
However, for a full understanding of Prime ACE,
I believe this part is very important.

If you’re interested, please also check the product page.

▼ product page

“Prime ACE Strategy”

https://www.gogojungle.co.jp/tools/indicators/77315?via=users