【Episode 4】Why does the result become the opposite even though the form is the same?
【Episode 4】Why the Same-Shaped Pattern Can Have the Opposite Result
Introduction: From here, we’ll talk about the “results”
By now, you should have a fairly clear picture.
- A chart isn’t complete with just one image
- There are reasons why the same shape can lead to different results
- The cause lies in the part that isn’t visible
So, what happens to those who notice this?
This time, simply put,
“How the results change”
We’ll focus only on this.
Compare two trades
First, I will use my past trades as examples.
Case ①: The usual entry
- Chart shape: good
- Timing: no problem
- Indicators: aligned
What is often called “ textbook-perfect”
At that time, I didn’t hesitate.
“This will be taken.”
The result was──
Small profit → against move → stop out
A common pattern.
Case ②: Entry that met a certain condition
Similar shape.
Similar timing.
But there was one difference.
That is,
“in line with the surrounding movements.”
This time, conversely,
I had a feeling like,
“I won’t miss this one.”
The result was──
Rises almost without stress
What was different?
The chart shape is almost the same.
Timing doesn’t change much either.
But the result is the exact opposite.
Only one thing was different.
“Whether it was in sync or not”
This “synchronization” is
not obvious at a glance.
But it certainly exists.
And when this synchrony is present,
trading becomes astonishingly simple.
Eliminating unnecessary trades
The biggest change is this.
“Moments you don’t need to trade” become clear
Previously,
- Entering somewhat randomly
- Entering when it seems like it might work
- Entering while hesitating
These kinds of trades happened often.
But now it’s different.
The reasons for entering become clear
- In sync → enter
- Not in sync → don’t trade
That’s all there is to it.
One important premise here
There is something I don’t want to cause misunderstanding about here.
That is,
“If they are in sync, you will win”
is not the point.
Understand trading as “loss-cutting as a baseline”
No matter how many conditions line up,
you can still lose as usual.
- The market moves by probability
- Unexpected moves will inevitably happen
- There is no such thing as a perfect entry
In other words,
loss-cutting is a given, not something to be avoided.
Then what changes?
This is important.
Before
- Entering in subtle situations
- More losing trades
- More frequent loss cuts
Now
- Eliminating situations where conditions aren’t met
- Fewer wasted loss cuts
- Only “meaningful losses” remain
The quality of loss-cutting changes
This is the biggest change.
Previously, loss-cutting was
“entered and lost for no particular reason”
Now, loss-cutting is
“a contained loss where the conditions were in place”
This difference
is quite large.
A state where you can accept a loss
People who trade calmly are not necessarily winning all the time.
They are composed of “losses they can accept.”
Once you reach this state,
- Your mental state doesn’t collapse
- Unnecessary revenge trading disappears
- You become overall stable
Winning rate didn’t actually go up
This is a common misconception, but
your win rate didn’t dramatically increase.
“The total amount of losses decreased”
But this is what matters most.
It’s not that you are “winning,” but that you are “not losing.”
This realization makes trading shift dramatically.
You won’t deplete capital
You won’t panic
- You won’t take reckless entries
As a result,
your gains stay
The meaning of days when you do nothing changes
Now, go back to Episode 1.
“A day of doing nothing”
Before
Anxiety
Now
“A day when not doing is better”
With this judgment alone, the rate of capital decline changes.
There are days in the market you should not trade
Trading is not something you do every day.
It is something you do only when the conditions are met.
Just adopting this perspective can greatly change the quality of trading.
But here you may hit a wall
After reading up to this point, you may think
“If I understood that, I wouldn’t be struggling.”
That’s true.
The real problem starts now.
Even if you understand, you can’t reproduce
Once you’ve felt the synchrony even once,
you’ll start to grasp it intuitively.
But──
- You can’t judge it every time
- You can’t be confident
- Your judgment wobbles
In short,
“reproducibility is lacking”
Human limits
- We cannot see multiple things at once
- Judgments wobble
- Emotions get involved
Even when you understand, you can’t stay stable…
Preview of next time
Next time is the final episode.
Theme:
“The problem is not that you can’t see, but that you can’t see even when you understand”
- Why can’t it be reproduced
- Why does it wobble
- How can you stabilize
In conclusion
If you’ve read this far and feel this, you’re fairly close.
- Want to reduce unnecessary losses
- Want to stop losing streaks
- Want to trade stably
The answer is already visible.
However, one piece is still missing.
Everything will connect in the next part.
Trading is not about “where to enter,” but
“where not to enter.”
This is where everything is decided.