What should be done first by people who want to reduce losses is not the improvement of 〇〇
When you keep losing in FX, the first thing many people think is, "If I could enter at a better place, I could win." If you enter more precisely, unnecessary losses will decrease. If you increase accuracy further, the results will improve. It’s natural to think that.
However, the first thing someone who wants to reduce losses should do isn’t necessarily to improve entry precision. Rather, what you should review first isthe very reasons that are making you lose in the first place.
Because many people who are actually struggling are more crushed by their subsequent judgments than by a slightly bad entry location. Delay the stop loss. Do off-rule averaging down. Increase unnecessary entries trying to recover. Take profits too early and magnify losses. When such things accumulate, even if entry accuracy improves, the overall result won’t be stable.
The causes that cause losses to grow are often in places like this.
- Delaying stop loss
- Entering repeatedly after losing
- Touching markets not in the rules
- Imbalance between take profit and stop loss
- Emotion disrupts the entire trading
Looking at it this way, what should be organized first is not only “how to enter” but also “how not to crumble.” In other words, to reduce losses the first thing needed isnot the sharpness of entry, but keeping the overall rules intact.
Even if the place to enter is a little off, if losses can be kept small, it’s less likely to lead to a big collapse. Conversely, even with good entry timing, if emotions cause a collapse afterward, the result will be poor. Therefore, the first step to reducing losses is to establish, before pursuing precision,a design that does not worsen losses.
If you want to reduce losses, the first thing to refine is
not entry technique, but a rule-based method that doesn’t crumble.
There are set times to watch, clear conditions to enter, fixed times to exit, and even decisions not to take in certain situations. This rule-based approach reduces unnecessary losses. It may not be flashy, but it makes it harder to act on emotions unnecessarily. As a result, losses are unlikely to swell.
My own realization of what is most important came here as well. Rather than attempting to increase precision, reducing unnecessary entries, not delaying stop losses, and proceeding only at predetermined times, seems to produce much more stable results. Especially beginners shouldprioritize a system that won’t crumble over a technique to win.
When trying to reduce losses, chasing entry precision right away can make things even harder. It increases what you must watch, judgments, and indecision. Then far from reducing losses, trading as a whole becomes more difficult.
The shortcut to reducing losses isn’t aiming for perfect entries.
It’s to first create a form that doesn’t widen losses.
So, if you’re currently struggling to reduce losses, it may be better to shift your initial perspective a little. Look at where you are crumbling before where you enter. That is more realistic in the end.
If you’re currently trying to reduce losses but feel hollow, what you should review may not be entry precision alone. What should be prepared first isa rule-based method that minimizes wasted losses and can be sustained without crumbling.
We are compiling a time-rule-based approach to avoid exhausting yourself with chart monitoring
I amfor beginners and low-risk orientedand have summarized a time strategy that does not require chart monitoring.
To prevent judgments from being swayed by emotions,a rule-based approach that proceeds only at set timesis the method.
If you no longer want to waver due to discretion, please check the details.
From the “Read more” button, you can also access the next entry date, performance, and a free method guide.