The more someone takes a roundabout path in FX, the more they tend to add to ○○
When you’re not seeing results in FX, people tend to think, “Something else is still missing.” Isn’t more precise analysis needed? Isn’t there a stronger indicator? If we add more detailed conditions, won’t we win? In that way, they keep trying to add new elements one after another.
However, the people who take a roundabout path in FX are actually doing the same thing here.They are adding too many difficult things
If you add too many difficult things, you’re likely to end up in this state:
- There are too many things to look at, slowing down judgment
- There are too many conditions, making it hard to enter
- Judgment criteria drift little by little each time
- It becomes hard to verify what is good and what is bad
- In the end, decisions are made by intuition
When this happens, you may think you’re strengthening your method, but in reality you’re just making it harder to implement. In other words, people who take the long way around aren’t lacking effort, butthey become more prone to fluctuation because they added too much.
Originally, what beginners need is not more complexity but clarity. A fixed viewing time. Clear entry conditions. Known exit timing. Even decide when not to act. A simpler form like this reduces doubt and makes repetition easier.
When things aren’t going well, people tend to move toward “adding.” But what is actually needed may be the opposite.Reduce the unnecessary and make it possible to repeat in the same way.
People who make progress in FX are not the ones who add difficult things.
They are the ones who keep only what is necessary and reduce uncertainty.
Even I found that to be true in the end. Rather than piling up complex and advanced things, watching at a set time, entering with set条件, and exiting at a set time. A rule-based approach is actually much easier to sustain. The difference is especially large for beginners and those doing it as a side job.
Knowing difficult things and having stable results are two different things. Even with a lot of knowledge, if you can’t execute, it’s meaningless. Conversely, if it’s simple and you can repeat it without hesitation, you can build it up little by little.
The reason for going around in circles may not be a lack of knowledge, but
carrying too complex an approach for yourself.
That’s why, if it’s painful right now even though you’re adding a lot of things, you should pause once. What you truly need may not be something new, but reducing and organizing what you already have.
If you’re finding studying more and more painful now, perhaps what should be reviewed isn’t the amount of effort. What should be reviewed isa rule-based method that doesn’t add too many difficult things and can be continued without strain.
I’m compiling a time-rule-based approach to prevent chart monitoring fatigue
I’mfor beginners and low-risk orientedand I’m outlining a time-based strategy that doesn’t require chart monitoring.
To avoid making judgments based on emotions,a rule-based approach that progresses only at the decided timesis the method.
If you don’t want to waver by discretion anymore, please check the details.
From the “Read more” button, you can also get the next entry date, performance, and a free method gift.