#12 What should we do about this! (^皿^;)
November 13, 2025: Note
Myrazor-Sharp trading techniqueis a logic of waiting for the peak or the bottom of the previous major wave.
If you surpass the peak of the previous major wave, wait for a sell (Razor-Sharp Technique – Official Version)
If you break the bottom of the previous major wave, wait for a buy (Razor-Sharp Technique – Hidden Version)
however...
I used to think the surface version is strong in uptrends and the hidden version in downtrends.
But the test results shown in the previous issue showed that
both the surface version and the hidden version work in either trend
...sweat.
This is...
Really, “What do we do here!”, right? (lol)
Losing words is exactly what this is.
Conclusion: It’s not the “trend” that wins, but the “logic and speed”
This result clearly says“What you should read is not the trend”.
I used to classify market environments (from a macro perspective) as rising trends or falling trends, but
the EA makes profits regardless of that.
This astonishing result is believed to be the perfect interplay of the following two factors.
1. The overwhelming superiority of the “waiting” logic
Most traders do
not follow indicators that merely represent past data and chase trends,
but
wait for the edge price level that all traders are aware of
—the razor-sharp trading logic.
This proves that you can accurately identify high-potential entry points that resist turning into trends or rangesregardless of market environment.
2. The ultra-fast scalping with “M1 settlement”
What wins is almost always the combination of a win with a one-minute candle for settlement.
After entering at a highly advantaged point,
you swiftly take profits on tiny retracements and exit before the price reverses
as an “ultra-fast scalping” function.
By setting the settlement timing to the end of the one-minute candle,
the stop-out threshold becomes the body of the previous one-minute candle,
and as a result it functions as a very tight stop, helping to preserve profits.
In short, this EA may be an EA that can (almost) neutralize the market environment.
So, what next? → The next step
I considered merging the surface and hidden versions into one program and
creating a hybrid that reads the trend and switches between the surface and hidden logic,
but
that may no longer be necessary.
However, we must not get overly optimistic.
There is still the most important data to confirm.
Most important confirmation: “Total number of trades.”
If anomalies like “all wins” or “PF 19.12” occur with only around 3 or 5 total trades in that period...
then, unfortunately, that would be just a fluke and not a statistically significant edge.
Conversely, if this results fromdozens of tradesor more,
that would be a true, genuine logic worthy of a holy grail.
Next time:
Among the tests conducted with this “visual trend,”
look at the combination that performed particularly well“Backtest report (showing total trades and average profit/loss)”to verify.
What’s especially intriguing is
the combinations of surface and hidden versions with 4H / 1M, and
1H / 1M.
※
The EA I’m developing automates, as I explained in Episode 2, a method that anyone can achieve manually by disabling scalping.
“A method that wins even without scalping” is being automated here.
This is the only paid article in this series (so far).
150 yen! Cheap!... President, cheap! ٩(ˊᗜˋ*)و
× ![]()
