Holding steady isn’t about “winning.” It was a condition that wouldn’t break
This is not逃げ
Nor is it giving up.
I simply faced reality.
Most people
in trading, they get what to fix wrong.
- They try to fix the win rate
- They try to fix the amount of profit
- They try to fix the correct form
But, you know,
the market cannot be fixed.
It moves. It distorts. It betrays.
That is the premise.
Well then,
what should have been fixed?
The answer is simple.
The conditions that keep you from breaking.
I realized it.
You do not break because of losing.
What breaks is always the judgment.
- Judgment made in doubt
- Judgment made in haste
- Judgment made by doubting yourself
- Judgment made to recover
All of it is in human hands.
So I decided.
Reduce judgment.
Delegate judgment.
Do not fix the judgment.
Instead, fix these conditions:
- When I reach this point, it's over
- Here, I do nothing
- From here on, I won't touch it
Only the condition to prevent breaking.
Something interesting happened.
Even though I stopped trying to win,
I stopped losing.
Even though I stopped chasing,
I began to remain.
Professionals, you see,
do not fix winning.
They build the structure that cannot break first.
Winning is
only a byproduct of that.
If now there are
- people who can win but feel anxious
- people who keep changing their method
- people who keep seeking the correct answer
then,
please consider this.
? Are you trying to fix the win?
Or are you fixing the condition not to break?
Next,
then concretely
what did you fix, and what did you discard?
That content goes inside.
When you read this,
you can’t go back to the old kind of trading anymore.
We’ll keep going.
