We can't win at all in past verifications

※This is about the existence of such tools. It is not about Ginosoku AI.

Summary (Just read this)

"Cannot win in the past but can win in the future" is a logical fallacy

・Past verification does not guarantee the future, butit is a minimum condition
・Tools that do not present past verificationhave a reason not toto present
Ginosoku AI is built on the premise of "past verification + ongoing verification"

"Past verification won't win, but the future will"
If someone tells you this, can you be convinced?
If you are convinced,beware.

What is the basis for claiming you can win in the future when you can't in the past?

Past verification is not a “future guarantee.” But it is a minimum condition

A common rebuttal is this.
"Even if you win in the past, it doesn't mean you will win in the future"
This is correct.We cannot guarantee the future.

However, ending here would be fraudulent.
If you haven't won in the past, the probability of winning in the future is even lower.

To illustrate, it is like this.
"Practice test score is 0. The actual test is perfect score"
Such a claim is not usually believed.

Beware of common sophistry (excuses)

Sophistry patterns

・"The past has nothing to do with it"
・"The market changes, so verification is meaningless"
・"Only those with discretion can win"
・"The future will be optimized from here"

In one sentence, respond

・Past has nothing to do → then what is the basis?
・Market changes → thereforeongoing verificationis necessary
・Discretion is needed → thenreproducibilityand verification?
・Future optimization → that isnot yet completejust a statement

Those who deny verification are simply unable to verify

Why tools that do not present past verification exist

・When verified, performance does not appear
・Verification method is opaque (discretion mixed in, retroactive changes, period selection)
・Cannot be revised by outsourcing; improvement cycles do not run

Not that they cannot be produced, but that if they are produced, they won't sell

What should you look at? (Minimal checklist)

Before buying, check only this

・Not trade history, butbacktest resultsexist?
・Not finished in under one year (not too short)
・Drawdown (maximum loss) is stated
・Verified across multiple currencies / multiple timeframes
・Rules are non-discretionary and reproducible (can you achieve the same results)

Look at how you lose, not how you win

Ginosoku AI is fundamentally opposed to “unverified tools”

Ginosoku AI premise

・Present past verification (fulfilling minimum conditions)
・Moreover, microAIautomatically relearns thousands of conditions
・Learner results areautomatically re-verified continuously
・Performance verification that humans cannot reproduce (speed, frequency, continuity)

Because there is past verification + ongoing verification, you can compete long-term

"You can't win in the past, but you can win in the future"
This is more about a pleasing sound than substance.
If a tool does not provide past verification, be suspicious.
Ginosoku AI is the opposite.It is founded on verificationas a principle.

Ginosoku AI is here

※ There are risks in investing. Past performance does not guarantee future results.