Conditions Where No Discretion Wins

Summary (Just read this)

Winning condition: "no discretion" = reproducibility

・Discretion is not bad, but with discretion alone it cannot be reproduced
・鬼速AI covers both logic and discretion, so it’s strong
・Amplitude = logic (entry) / Sync = discretion (exit decision)

People who have won with discretion tend to stop here.
“I can read it.” “If I do the same next time, I can win again.”
But what’s tested in a world of ongoing wins is not talent, butreproducibility.

Winning with discretion is only natural.
The question is “will it continue?”

Why is "no discretion" the winning condition

No discretion does not mean trading mechanically and coldly.
It means deciding the numbers for “this happens, then this happens.”.

・With no discretion, you can reproduce the same judgments any number of times
・Because you can reproduce, you can backtest
・Because you can backtest, you can improve

Wins that cannot be reproduced do not become assets

Weaknesses of discretion (not insults but structure)

Discretion is strong. The discretion of skilled traders is truly strong.
However, discretion has structural weaknesses.

・Judgments drift due to fatigue or emotions
・Just-in-time judging increases due to time of day or news
・Cannot be backtested later (reasons remain only in the brain)
・Even in identical situations, you are prone to choose differently

Discretion is the strongest, but also the hardest to reproduce

Important: You don’t have to discard discretion (move its place)

This is a common misunderstanding.
Discretion ≠ evil. The issue is“where to put it”.

If you include discretion,place it not at the entry but at the exit (settlement).
Putting discretion at the entry increases hesitation, prevents backtesting, and breaks reproducibility.

Do not put discretion at entry. Use it for settlements

鬼速AI’s answer: optimize the placement of logic × discretion

Roles are clearly divided

・Amplitude: logic (entry signals)
・Sync: discretion after the market moves (exit signals)

Do not hesitate at the moment of entry. Decide at the moment of exit

Case studies (skimming: 2 patterns)

Pattern A: Completely no discretion

・Enter with Amplitude (fixed rules)
・Exit when Sync pivot is confirmed (fixed decision)
・Use fixed rules for stop loss / take profit

Pattern B: with discretion (existing discretion OK)

・Entry fixed by Amplitude (zero hesitation)
・Exit with Sync + your discretion (time of day, events, etc.)
・But do not increase exceptions; keep discretion to a minimum

Existing discretion does not need to be discarded.
However, the entry should be no-discretion, use discretion at the exit

Why can鬼速AI cover both

Why鬼速AI is strong

・Eliminates hesitation with logic (Amplitude) and makes entry no-discretion
・Discretion (Sync) provides decision material after movement, strengthening settlement
・microAI adapts to market changes byautomatically relearning thousands of conditions
・The learning resultscontinue to be re-verified automatically
・A level of backtesting performance (speed, frequency, persistence) impossible for humans

Enter with no discretion, win with discretion

Finally (in brief)

・The condition for sustained winning is no discretion (reproducibility)
・Don’t discard discretion. Move its use to the settlement stage
・Amplitude = entry logic / Sync = exit discretion decision
・鬼速AI covers both logic and discretion and is designed to stack wins

鬼速AI is here

※ There are risks in investing. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Reasons why there is no discretion winning