Reasons Why You Still Lose Even With Logic

Summary (Just read this)

Just having a logic you created won’t guarantee a win

・The reason of losing lies in “things other than logic”
・As long as humans do them, results won’t change
・The Ultra-Fast AI is built with this “unavoidable part” as a premise

I read books. I learned. I did some validation as well.
Still, I can’t win.
The hardest thing for people who have come this far is that they feel they are the ones who are wrong.
But there is an even harsher truth.

That logic is probably not wrong.
Still, you lose because another part is collapsing.

The Biggest Misunderstanding: “Not winning = Logic is bad”

First, doubt this.
When many people lose, they tend to change the logic.
But in reality, it’s not that the logic is fatal,it’s that the operation is collapsingin most cases.

Even with correct logic, you lose

Common Point ①: Adding discretionary judgment

・Delay entries a bit (or speed them up)
・Take profits early (fear takes over)
・Extend stop losses (prayers begin)
・Handle exceptions with “this time it’s different”

Logic + discretion = a different gamble

Common Point ②: Validation is either insufficient or biased

This is a painful but common issue.
Judging from a winning period and deeming it workable.

・Validation period is short
・Market state (trend/range) is biased
・Currency pairs and timeframes are limited
・Only favorable moments are picked

That’s not validation, but a confirmation exercise

Common Point ③: No assumption that the market will change

Logic is fixed. The market changes.
If you skim this, you’ll surely hit a wall somewhere.

Market changes come in these forms.
・Price range (volatility) changes
・The ratio of trends to ranges changes
・Time bands, participants, and event patterns change

Logic doesn’t break. It just stops matching

Common Point ④ (Core): Validation and adjustment are being attempted by humans

This is the main topic.
From the moment you create a logic, its degradation countdown begins.
Yet many people stop saying, “I’m busy,” or “I’ll do it when I have time.”

・Validation is tedious
・There’s no time
・Conditions become too many to manage
・In the end, it’s neglected

Humans cannot sustain continuous validation

Block the escape routes

“I’ll do it when I have time” → that day never comes
“I’ll validate once I’m used to it” → by the time I’m used to it, the deviation is large
“I’m just busy now” → busy people neglect it and don’t notice the deterioration

That’s why Ultra-Fast AI is designed to have AI handle this part

What microAI does

・As market changes,retrain thousands of conditions automatically
・Continue to automatically re-validate the learningand evaluation performance (speed, frequency, continuity)
・Capabilities that humans cannot reproduce

The cause of not winning lies more in operation than in logic.
And operation is where humans make the most mistakes.

People who lose with logic are losing outside of logic

Click here for Ultra-Fast AI

※ Investments involve risk. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Can't win with trading rules alone