I teach the “how to win” for making a victory
Good morning.
This is the Nikoku AI Public Relations.
・Could you win without sign tools or indicators?
・Aren't sign tools expensive?
For those who feel that way, here is a method to build your own logic!
If you want to create your own logic,https://www.gogojungle.co.jp/tools/ebooks/48925【GOLDEN LESSON】 is also recommended.
Create a “winning method” in 5 STEPS
① Write a logically consistent approach
First, write out your logic.
Usually you consider how to translate trend-following, range, reversal, and volatility into numbers.
A poor-signal tool will be disqualified at this stage.
If the logical combination or numerical logic collapses, the premise is wrong.
Mathematical thinking, market knowledge, and experience are essential here.
② Eliminate waste and add filtering
Test and review real trades.
When creating logic, there must be no discretionary input.
A logic is something that can be defined by numbers as “if this, then that.”
For example,
“1+1 equals 2, but sometimes 3.”
“Sometimes? Experience.”
That cannot be called logic.
1+1 is always 2, so the logic of addition works.
Therefore, with zero discretion, review past charts to see what trades were made, and rebuild the logic saying, “This is unnecessary” or “This needs filtering.”
③ Must test over at least several past years
“Will a logic that didn’t win in the past win in the future?”
Of course, this is difficult.
“If it won in the past, will it win in the future?”
The likelihood is high.
It is hard to imagine a logic that won for 400 days until yesterday will stop working today or tomorrow.
From this perspective, first build a logic that at least won in the past and
・Does not rely on parameters (for example, moving averages of 14 for USD/JPY, 32 for EUR/USD changing is not acceptable)
・Works across multiple major currency pairs
・Works on multiple timeframes
Use ForexTester or MT4 Strategy Tester to validate the logic.
“Just by feel” is a waste of time.
Under clear entry and exit criteria, prove that profits increase clearly.
④ Validate with real trading
Here we verify whether emotions wobble or discretion still loses.
We examine, for example, whether longer position holds, during events or time zones, or with holidays where discretion is used, you still don’t lose.
For instance, if position duration is too long, or when a event, time of day, or holiday discretion is involved,
does it still avoid losses?
By the time you reach this stage, you won’t lose.
It is sufficient for personal use, but if you are considering selling or offering, you should formalize it into a trading manual.
⑤ Adapt to market changes (important)
“Won for 400 days in the past. Can I win this week?” → YES
“Won for 400 days in the past. Can I win next month?” → YES
“Won for 400 days in the past. After 400 days?” → ?
Winning in the past is obvious. It is a minimum condition.
However, if you cannot adapt to market changes, the edge will gradually erode.
Most sign tools assume they will someday stop working.
However, “Nikoku AI” has a uniquely developed microAI engine that constantly verifies, allowing continuous adaptation to the market.
【Caution】
Be careful of untested sign tools
Be cautious of signs that promote gambling without a cycle of verification→demonstration→adjustment as described above.
No past verification results
Sign tools that do not publish objective verification results for the past year (not just trading history) lack credibility.
Also, even if a tool claims “I am winning” based on trading history, capital size, time, and psychology vary by person, so it is not proof that using that tool will make you win.
Denying past verification
Some cases do not publish past verification results with statements like, “The past was not guaranteed to win, so the future won’t be either.”
However, this raises the question, “If even the past wasn’t winning, would the future win?”
If that person says, “The past was winning,” then they are essentially following the logic that “if the past could win, the future can win.”
In other words, there is no way to prove winning other than backtesting without discretion over the long term.
What can be stated as a minimum is, “If it has won so far, it could win this week, next month, or in half a year.”
Only claim a specific scenario
“I could take this many pips in this situation!”
You too should be able to take a certain number of pips.
Anyone can win in a specific situation.
The hard part is to win consistently over the long term.
The proof for this cannot be other than backtesting without discretion.
Development outsourced
Outsourcing EA or indicator development costs 50,000 yen or more per item.
Also, changing part of the logic during a review costs another 10,000 yen or more per change.
As mentioned, creating a “winning logic” requires many trials and errors, dozens of changes.
With outsourcing, it can cost hundreds of thousands of yen to produce a satisfactory indicator.
In other words, outsourcing indicators are likely to be unverified or risky and incomplete.
Are sign tools expensive?
The answer is “it depends.”
As shown in the method for creating winning strategies,
・No parameter dependence
・No significant emotional swings
・Almost no discretion
・Stability with several years of wins
Achieving this without discretion is a substantial undertaking.
How much have you blown as your “study cost”?
Honestly,about 50,000 yenis, in terms of trading profits,an “hourly wage” level.
A book or a vague course alone won’t make you win.
Because experience is needed to build winning logic.
To gain experience,losing hundreds of thousands of yen is normal
However,if you can buy those hundreds of thousands of yen worth of loss for just 50,000 yen and gain immediate winning capability today,
it would be extraordinarily cheap.
✔ Verified
✔ AI continually verifies and remains effective long-term
Only claim a specific scenario