Why do professionals reduce "judgment"? ~ It wasn't the entry that was removed ~

Pro professionals seem to be narrowing down on “where to enter.”

But in reality,

the thing most trimmed isn’t the entry decision.

What’s being trimmed is something more mundane,

yet the part that collapses the most easily.

That is—

the decision to continue or quit.

When I look back on my past,

the common points on losing days are clear.

・Lose once and continue with “just one more try”

・Set a time limit but drag it on

・Even in a marginal situation, enter thinking “I can go”

At that moment,

the method wasn’t broken.

What was broken was

the act of continuing to decide.

Pros cut this off from the start.

・How many times

・How far

・What condition ends it

they decide these before the market moves.

So,

even if the market is volatile,

even if they suffer a string of losses,

there is no “room to think.”

The important thing is here.

Pros

aren’t trying to “make good judgments.”

They create a state where they don’t have to judge.

The moment I began to change in trading was

in this aspect.

・After entering, leave it to fate

・Settlement conditions are fixed in advance

・Difficult days end calmly

Just by enforcing this,

my sense of trading became entirely different.

It wasn’t so much that win rate increased

as that it stopped collapsing.

That difference is huge.

If now,

・ fatigue in judgment

・ consistently losing in the same way

・ thinking “let me reset” only to fall apart

If you’re in that state,

what you should reassess isn’t the entry.

It might be the very structure that keeps deciding.