Your "Complete Non-Repaint" is not yours!
● The Traps Hidden in “Truly Non-Repaint”
Many indicator tools in the market boast “non-repaint,” and among them some claim to be “truly non-repaint.”
However, there is a potential “trap” hidden in this.
“Truly non-repaint” does not simply refer to the sign not changing in real time.
All three of the following conditions must be met.
① The sign does not change in real time
✓The sign displayed after the candle closes should not shift or disappear later
This generally falls under the common notion of “no repaint.”
✓This is typically what is meant by repaint-free
→Many tools claim “non-repaint” by satisfying only this condition, but
this alone does not make it “complete.”
② If you re-display the chart, the sign appears in the same place
✓When you create a new chart and display it again,
the sign’s candle position does not shift or disappear
✓It heavily depends on the structure of saved data and the internal logic of the indicator
→This phenomenon is called “history mismatch repaint,”
and it leads to unverifiable tests or invalid statistical conclusions.
③ The past and the future match = reproducibility and verifiability
✓The signs that appeared on the chart in the past
must perfectly match the signs displayed when you create a new chart and display again
✓This enables backtesting, statistical validation, and probabilistic expectations to hold
✓Statistically demonstrable edge and a foundation for repeatable trading logic
→If sign reproducibility is absent,you cannot even analyze “why you won,”
and it merely becomes a form of “gambling.”
● “Truly Non-Repaint” = Causality Adherence Across Timeframes
“Truly non-repaint” meansthat it preserves the causal relationship across timeframes: past→present→future.
In contrast, if it is not “truly non-repaint,”the causality can reverse, creating an unreal structure where the future changes the past
✓and the validation results do not align with real outcomes
Preserving causality with “truly non-repaint” is what guaranteesthe theoretical consistency of the sequence “past → present → future.”
● In Investing, Consistency and Reproducibility Matter
To profit steadily in trading,the rule of “this situation calls for this judgment” must always yield the same result.
For that, the following three conditions are necessary.
① Reproducibility
Under the same conditions, the same sign should always appear.
For example—
✓The sign you saw on yesterday’s chart
✓The sign at the same time frame and currency pair when displayed today, at the same location as yesterday
If this does not match, correct validation becomes impossible.
In other words, if a “repaint with past data” phenomenon occurs where signs appear at different candle positions later, reproducibility is zero.
② Verification of edge based on probability theory
Being able to measure win rate and profitability numerically.
Trading is something you cannot predict the future for.
Therefore, you must confirm statistically whether a past pattern provided a edge, e.g., “under these conditions, 60 out of 100 times you would have won.”
However…
✓If the sign shown on a past chart differs from real time?
✓If the position of the sign’s candle later changes?
That becomes not probability theory but a convenient fiction.
‘A repaint without reproducibility can’t even stand on the probabilistic stage.’
In trading, concepts like “win rate” and “expectancy” are all based on statistical probability theory.
Unless you accept this premise, quantifying an edge in the market is impossible.
And the conditions under which statistical probability holds are clear, summarized in one point:
“Under identical conditions, the same output is obtained,” i.e., reproducibility.
③ It is not gambling but an investment
The biggest difference between gambling and investing iswhether you can control it.
✓Gambling: leave it to luck, win or lose by chance
✓Investing: follow predefined rules and judge by long-term expectancy
If even looking at past charts, signs do not appear in the same place, it’s no different from luck.
If you don’t know why you won, you can neither reproduce nor learn, and it becomes gambling.
● Therefore, “non-repaint” is insufficient.
“Truly non-repaint” is the essential condition
Truly reliable logic must
✓have also appeared on past charts
✓in live trading
✓even when you create and re-display a new chart
consistently produce the same signs (i.e., reproducibility is required).
If it is not “truly non-repaint,” it’s essentially curve-fitting (over-optimizing) by aligning with past charts, carrying the same risk.
As a result,“Validation → Improvement → Deployment” in trading investment PDCA cycles cannot function, and it fundamentally destroys the construction of reproducible trading strategies.
Technical analysis, by nature, is a scientific investment backed by statistics and reproducibility.
If the conditions in the past and present are not the same, the results are meaningless.
A superficially real-time sign that merely seems non-repainting is doomed to fail in validation, learning, and reproducible operation.
● Our Sign Indicator is “Truly Non-Repaint”
→Our Sign Indicator
not only avoids obvious repaint but also completely eliminates
“history mismatch repaint.”
✓Signs do not change in real time (i.e., standard repaint elimination)
✓Even when you create and re-display a new chart, signs do not change at all (i.e., history mismatch repaint elimination)
The four candle values (open, close, high, low) also do not change after confirmation.
Also, existing indicators like MA, RSI, MACD have fixed values after confirmation
Similarly, once a sign appears, it must not retroactively change in the past.
Because otherwise—
without “truly non-repaint,” statistical evaluation is impossible.
To verify edge using probability theory, two prerequisites are essential.
✓Under the same conditions, the same result always occurs (reproducibility)
✓If conditions do not change, the sign does not change (reliability)
Thus,
① Accurate validation using past charts
② Statistical identification of “winning patterns” is more feasible
③ You can verify “why you won or lost,” enabling learning and improvement
④ Trading becomes reproducible-based on rules and expectation, not luck
Many indicator tools in the market boast “non-repaint,” and among them some claim to be “truly non-repaint.”
However, there is a potential “trap” hidden in this.
“Truly non-repaint” does not simply refer to the sign not changing in real time.
All three of the following conditions must be met.
① The sign does not change in real time
✓The sign displayed after the candle closes should not shift or disappear later
This generally falls under the common notion of “no repaint.”
✓This is typically what is meant by repaint-free
→Many tools claim “non-repaint” by satisfying only this condition, but
this alone does not make it “complete.”
② If you re-display the chart, the sign appears in the same place
✓When you create a new chart and display it again,
the sign’s candle position does not shift or disappear
✓It heavily depends on the structure of saved data and the internal logic of the indicator
→This phenomenon is called “history mismatch repaint,”
and it leads to unverifiable tests or invalid statistical conclusions.
③ The past and the future match = reproducibility and verifiability
✓The signs that appeared on the chart in the past
must perfectly match the signs displayed when you create a new chart and display again
✓This enables backtesting, statistical validation, and probabilistic expectations to hold
✓Statistically demonstrable edge and a foundation for repeatable trading logic
→If sign reproducibility is absent,you cannot even analyze “why you won,”
and it merely becomes a form of “gambling.”
● “Truly Non-Repaint” = Causality Adherence Across Timeframes
“Truly non-repaint” meansthat it preserves the causal relationship across timeframes: past→present→future.
In contrast, if it is not “truly non-repaint,”the causality can reverse, creating an unreal structure where the future changes the past
✓and the validation results do not align with real outcomes
Preserving causality with “truly non-repaint” is what guaranteesthe theoretical consistency of the sequence “past → present → future.”
● In Investing, Consistency and Reproducibility Matter
To profit steadily in trading,the rule of “this situation calls for this judgment” must always yield the same result.
For that, the following three conditions are necessary.
① Reproducibility
Under the same conditions, the same sign should always appear.
For example—
✓The sign you saw on yesterday’s chart
✓The sign at the same time frame and currency pair when displayed today, at the same location as yesterday
If this does not match, correct validation becomes impossible.
In other words, if a “repaint with past data” phenomenon occurs where signs appear at different candle positions later, reproducibility is zero.
② Verification of edge based on probability theory
Being able to measure win rate and profitability numerically.
Trading is something you cannot predict the future for.
Therefore, you must confirm statistically whether a past pattern provided a edge, e.g., “under these conditions, 60 out of 100 times you would have won.”
However…
✓If the sign shown on a past chart differs from real time?
✓If the position of the sign’s candle later changes?
That becomes not probability theory but a convenient fiction.
‘A repaint without reproducibility can’t even stand on the probabilistic stage.’
In trading, concepts like “win rate” and “expectancy” are all based on statistical probability theory.
Unless you accept this premise, quantifying an edge in the market is impossible.
And the conditions under which statistical probability holds are clear, summarized in one point:
“Under identical conditions, the same output is obtained,” i.e., reproducibility.
③ It is not gambling but an investment
The biggest difference between gambling and investing iswhether you can control it.
✓Gambling: leave it to luck, win or lose by chance
✓Investing: follow predefined rules and judge by long-term expectancy
If even looking at past charts, signs do not appear in the same place, it’s no different from luck.
If you don’t know why you won, you can neither reproduce nor learn, and it becomes gambling.
● Therefore, “non-repaint” is insufficient.
“Truly non-repaint” is the essential condition
Truly reliable logic must
✓have also appeared on past charts
✓in live trading
✓even when you create and re-display a new chart
consistently produce the same signs (i.e., reproducibility is required).
If it is not “truly non-repaint,” it’s essentially curve-fitting (over-optimizing) by aligning with past charts, carrying the same risk.
As a result,“Validation → Improvement → Deployment” in trading investment PDCA cycles cannot function, and it fundamentally destroys the construction of reproducible trading strategies.
Technical analysis, by nature, is a scientific investment backed by statistics and reproducibility.
If the conditions in the past and present are not the same, the results are meaningless.
A superficially real-time sign that merely seems non-repainting is doomed to fail in validation, learning, and reproducible operation.
● Our Sign Indicator is “Truly Non-Repaint”
→Our Sign Indicator
not only avoids obvious repaint but also completely eliminates
“history mismatch repaint.”
✓Signs do not change in real time (i.e., standard repaint elimination)
✓Even when you create and re-display a new chart, signs do not change at all (i.e., history mismatch repaint elimination)
The four candle values (open, close, high, low) also do not change after confirmation.
Also, existing indicators like MA, RSI, MACD have fixed values after confirmation
Similarly, once a sign appears, it must not retroactively change in the past.
Because otherwise—
without “truly non-repaint,” statistical evaluation is impossible.
To verify edge using probability theory, two prerequisites are essential.
✓Under the same conditions, the same result always occurs (reproducibility)
✓If conditions do not change, the sign does not change (reliability)
Thus,
① Accurate validation using past charts
② Statistical identification of “winning patterns” is more feasible
③ You can verify “why you won or lost,” enabling learning and improvement
④ Trading becomes reproducible-based on rules and expectation, not luck
× ![]()