|
Hello! This is Lee from GogoJungle.
A hugely popular series: a conversation between our CEO, Hayakawa, and developers!
This time,Exy-2has joined us.
In this session,we take a thorough look at three elements reviewed to stabilize trading: “rule-setting,” “lot management,” and “martingale (averaging down).”We’ll dive deeper into the tool that turned these into a concrete “form”――from the background of developing the discretionary support EA “Exy Panel One” to the fine details of its features. How do you combine discretion and automation, and how do you compensate for traders’ weaknesses? This session clearly reveals the ingenuity and philosophy behind it.
|
|
|
| Build a mistake-free trading environment with IT engineering design power |
|
Exy-2
Started FX in 2014, and after trial and error with discretionary trading, turned attention to the potential of EAs. Began learning MQL4 to “turn ideal logic into reality,” and now, as Exy-2 FX Laboratory, develops automated trading EAs and discretionary support tools.
Leveraging design and analytical skills cultivated as an IT freelance engineer, we pursue a trading environment that “isn’t swayed by emotions and reduces mistakes.”
We aim to develop highly practical tools born from personal experience.
|
|
| This is Hayakawa, CEO of GogoJungle! Our guest this time, Exy-2, has prepared a free gift for everyone viewing this article + video. The password can be found in the previous video. |
|
|
| GogoJungle Hayakawa |
|
|
1. “Rule-setting” as the key to improving trading and the rebuilding of money management
|
| Previously, we heard that the foundation of how you stabilized your trading was “setting rules and handling lot adjustments and martingale correctly.” Could you tell us again how important these points were? |
|
|
|
| GogoJungle Hayakawa |
|
|
| Exy-2 |
|
| In my case, during my losing period, it wasn’t that “martingale is bad,” but that it was “emotional martingale.” I piled on positions without a plan to recover losses—that was the cause of collapse. So the first improvement was to “treat martingale as a rule.” |
|
| In other words, martingale itself isn’t evil; unmanaged martingale is dangerous. |
|
|
|
| GogoJungle Hayakawa |
|
|
|
| Exy-2 |
|
| Exactly. Just “predefining” numbers like spacing, lot multiplier, and allowed loss amount changed outcomes significantly. From there, I organized the mechanisms for lot management and the concept of money management. |
|
| At the time, did you wish it could be easier to manage? |
|
|
|
| GogoJungle Hayakawa |
|
|
|
| Exy-2 |
|
| I did. I wanted to retain the decision-making unique to discretionary trading but avoid calculations and mistakes. That led to the division of roles: “humans make decisions, the EA handles management.” |
|
| And this way of thinking led to “Exy Panel One,” correct? |
|
|
|
| GogoJungle Hayakawa |
|
|
|
| Exy-2 |
|
| Yes. Keep the strengths of discretion, and leave all the weaknesses to the EA. That’s where development began. |
|
|
